Opinion
Nos. 9884, 9920.
Argued June 16, 1949.
Decided July 29, 1949.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Guy K. Bard, Judge.
Raymond Pace Alexander, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.
Leon Fox, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for the United States.
Harry R. Axelroth, Philadelphia, Pa. (Axelroth Porteous, on the brief), for defendants.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.
Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F. Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.