Rivers v. Bank of Am. N.A.

Full title: CORNELL RIVERS, SR., Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 24, 2016

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-4002-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jun. 24, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-4002-G (BH)

06-24-2016

CORNELL RIVERS, SR., Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant.

A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

Since plaintiff has not timely filed an amended complaint as allowed by the recommendation, defendant Bank of America N.A.'s motion to dismiss plaintiff Cornell Rivers, Sr.'s petition and its memorandum of law in support of its motion to dismiss, filed December 23, 2015 (docket entry 5) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, plaintiff's claims against defendant will be DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED. June 24, 2014.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge