From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivero v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 14, 2006
Case No. 3:06-CV-0132-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-CV-0132-LRH-RAM.

March 14, 2006


MINUTES OF THE COURT


Defendants have removed this civil action from the Seventh Judicial District Court of Nevada in White Pine County. Removal is based on this court's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331(docket #2). Defendants now move for screening of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (docket #3) and for an extension of time to answer or otherwise defend the complaint (docket #4). The motions shall be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for screening (docket #3) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for extension of time to answer (docket #4) is granted. No answer or other response shall be due from defendants until such time as the Court has screened the complaint and ordered a response.


Summaries of

Rivero v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 14, 2006
Case No. 3:06-CV-0132-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Rivero v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:DAMIEN RIVERO, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06-CV-0132-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2006)