From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riverkeeper v. District

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 10, 2013
2:12-cv-01330-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2013)

Opinion

          Christopher A. Sproul (Bar No. 126398), ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES, San Francisco, California, Daniel Cooper (Bar No. 153576), Drevet Hunt (Bar No. 240487), LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC., San Francisco, California, Patricia Weisseblberg, (Bar No. 253015), LAW OFFICE OF PATRICIA WEISSELBERG, Mill Valley, California, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. KLAMATH RIVERKEEPER and the KARUK TRIBE.

          Robert E. Donlan (Bar No. 186185), Elizabeth P. Ewens, (Bar No. 213046), Shane E. C. McCoin, (Bar No. 258588), ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP, Sacramento, California, Darrin W. Mercier (Bar No. 166125), LAW OFFICE OF DARRIN W. MERCIER, Yreka, California, Attorneys for Defendant, MONTAGUE WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT.


          JOINT REQUEST TO RELEASE TO THE PARTIES THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT AS STATED ON THE RECORD AND SEALED BY THE COURT ON AUGUST 29, 2013; [PROPOSED] ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         JOINT REQUEST TO RELEASE SEALED TRANSCRIPT TO THE PARTIES

         Klamath Riverkeeper and the Karuk Tribe ("Plaintiffs") and Montague Water Conservation District ("Defendant") (collectively "the Parties") jointly request that the Court release to the Parties the transcript of "the terms and conditions are as stated on the record. (SEALED)" of the Parties' partial settlement, as recorded by the Electronic Court Reporter during the August 29, 2013 settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Claire.

         The Parties request access to the sealed transcript in order to facilitate further settlement negotiations and complete resolution of this case. Further, the Parties request immediate release of the transcript since settlement negotiations are proceeding and the Parties have scheduled imminent deadlines for exchanges of additional terms and conditions of settlement. The Parties agree that both the transcript and the substance of the terms addressed therein are to remain confidential and will not be shared, disclosed, or distributed to any third party or parties absent agreement in writing by the Parties.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         Pursuant to the joint request of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court authorizes release to the Parties of the transcript of "the terms and conditions are as stated on the record. (SEALED)" of the Parties' partial settlement, as recorded by the Electronic Court Reporter during the August 29, 2013 settlement conference. The Parties shall keep the transcript confidential.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Riverkeeper v. District

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 10, 2013
2:12-cv-01330-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Riverkeeper v. District

Case Details

Full title:KLAMATH RIVERKEEPER, Plaintiff, v. MONTAGUE WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 10, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-01330-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2013)