Riverdale Environ. Action Comm v. Metropolitan

Full title: RIVERDALE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COMMITTEE ALONG THE HUDSON-R.E.A.C.H.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Aug 13, 1986

797 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 1598, Docket 86-6102.

Argued July 18, 1986.

Decided August 13, 1986.

William Hoppen, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert M. Lustberg, New York City (Walter E. Zullig, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Metropolitan Transp. Authority and Metro North Commuter R. Co.

Randy M. Mastro, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Mary Ellen Kris and Jane E. Booth, Asst. U.S. Attys., Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Urban Mass Transp. Admin.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before WINTER and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges, and ZAMPANO, District Judge.^_

_ Honorable Robert C. Zampano, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Walker. See Riverdale Environmental Action Committee Along the Hudson v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 638 F.Supp. 99 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).