From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Triangle Excavators, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 19, 2019
173 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2018–02643 Index No. 508663/15

06-19-2019

Ivette RIVERA, Appellant, v. TRIANGLE EXCAVATORS OF NEW YORK, LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Thomas Torto, New York, N.Y. (Jason Levine of counsel), for appellant. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Maya Petrocelli of counsel), for respondent.


Thomas Torto, New York, N.Y. (Jason Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Maya Petrocelli of counsel), for respondent.

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, BETSY BARROS, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10 to set aside certain transfers as fraudulent, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Andrew Borrok, J.), dated January 18, 2018. The order granted the motion of the defendant Triangle Excavators of New York, LLC, pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015(a)(1) and (3) to vacate a judgment of the same court (Kathy J. King, J.) dated June 23, 2017, entered upon its failure to appear or answer, and to compel the plaintiff to accept its late answer.

ORDERED that the order dated January 18, 2018, is affirmed, with costs.

" CPLR 317 provides, generally, that a defendant is entitled to vacatur of a default judgment if it is established that he did not receive personal notice of the summons in time to defend and that he has a meritorious defense" ( Stein v. Matarasso & Co., 143 A.D.2d 825, 826, 533 N.Y.S.2d 126 ; see Rios v. Starrett City, Inc., 31 A.D.3d 418, 418, 818 N.Y.S.2d 526 ). "It is also well established that service on a corporation through delivery of process to the Secretary of State is not ‘personal delivery’ to the corporation or to an agent designated under CPLR 318" ( Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 142, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 ; see Solomon Abrahams, P.C. v. Peddlers Pond Holding Corp., 125 A.D.2d 355, 356, 509 N.Y.S.2d 78 ).

Here, the defendant Triangle Excavators of New York, LLC (hereinafter the defendant), by submitting evidence that the Secretary of State mailed the summons and complaint to an entity other than the defendant, established that it did not receive personal notice in time to defend, and that there was no evidence that it deliberately attempted to avoid notice (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d at 143, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 ; Rios v. Starrett City, Inc., 31 A.D.3d at 418, 818 N.Y.S.2d 526 ; contra Conte Cadillac v. C.A.R.S. Purch. Serv., 126 A.D.2d 621, 622, 511 N.Y.S.2d ). "[T]here is no necessity for a defendant moving pursuant to CPLR 317 to show a reasonable excuse for its delay" ( Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d at 141, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Wassertheil v. Elburg, LLC, 94 A.D.3d 753, 754, 941 N.Y.S.2d 679 ; Solomon Abrahams, P.C. v. Peddlers Pond Holding Corp., 125 A.D.2d at 356, 509 N.Y.S.2d 78 ). The defendant also submitted evidence that "sufficiently raises an issue as to the existence of a meritorious defense within the purview of CPLR 317 so as to support a motion to vacate a default judgment obtained as a result of service upon the Secretary of State" ( Solomon Abrahams, P.C. v. Peddlers Pond Holding Corp., 125 A.D.2d at 357, 509 N.Y.S.2d 78 ).

Accordingly, we agree with the Supreme Court's determination granting that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 317 to vacate the judgment dated June 23, 2017, and to compel the plaintiff to accept its late answer.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

AUSTIN, J.P., MILLER, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rivera v. Triangle Excavators, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 19, 2019
173 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Rivera v. Triangle Excavators, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Ivette Rivera, appellant, v. Triangle Excavators of New York, LLC…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
100 N.Y.S.3d 883
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4977

Citing Cases

Schirmer v. Piazza

Pursuant to CPLR 317, a defaulting defendant that was "served with a summons other than by personal…

Moonachi Inc. v. Aurora Loan Servs.

Here, US Bank, by submitting evidence that it was not served with process in this action and that the…