From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 23, 1989
543 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1845.

May 23, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Federico A. Moreno, J.

Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey Ross, P.A., and Benjamin S. Waxman and Frederick S. Robbins, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni B. Braunstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


We affirm Rivera's convictions for trafficking in cocaine and marijuana. However, we reverse Rivera's sentences because the two reasons given by the trial court for departure from the sentencing guidelines were invalid.

The first reason for departure — that Rivera was a professional drug dealer — was invalid; being a drug dealer is an inherent component of the crime of drug trafficking. Young v. State, 502 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

The second reason for departure — the "professional manner" in which Rivera committed the crime — was also invalid. Collins v. State, 535 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We, therefore, remand for sentencing within the guidelines.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Rivera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 23, 1989
543 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Rivera v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAMON RIVERA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 23, 1989

Citations

543 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. State

Collins v. State, 535 So.2d 661, 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In fact, in Collins, the state agreed that the…

Hernandez v. State

Some of these cases involved drug offenses of trafficking, possession, and conspiracy, while others were…