From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Ragan Ragan, P.C.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 25, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-1619 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 25, 2010)

Summary

In Rivera, the district court held that a claim for unfair debt collection methods under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act did not invoke the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because it disputed the manner in which a debt was collected, not the state court judgment creating the debt.

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Thornton

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-1619.

June 25, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant Ragan Ragan, P.C.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4), and the Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Rivera v. Ragan Ragan, P.C.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 25, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-1619 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 25, 2010)

In Rivera, the district court held that a claim for unfair debt collection methods under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act did not invoke the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because it disputed the manner in which a debt was collected, not the state court judgment creating the debt.

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Thornton
Case details for

Rivera v. Ragan Ragan, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:EFRAIN RIVERA, Plaintiff, v. RAGAN RAGAN, P.C., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 25, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-1619 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Edwards v. Thornton

The Edwards companies also advance two new arguments in support of their § 1983 claim against Thornton that…

Ahmed v. W. Coast Servicing Inc.

Judge Kelly concluded the Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not bar the claims because "[consumer] does not…