From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Food and Drug Admin

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 22, 2009
346 F. App'x 693 (2d Cir. 2009)

Summary

warning a pro se plaintiff with a history of frivolous litigation, that he may have to seek leave of court before filing any further actions

Summary of this case from U.S. ex rel. Wolf v. United States

Opinion

No. 08-2467-cv.

September 22, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Vincent F. Rivera, pro se, Milton, FL, for Appellant.

Varuni Nelson, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellees Food and Drug Administration and any other Federal Defendants.

PRESENT: ROGER J. MINER, CHESTER J. STRAUB, and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.


SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Vincent F. Rivera, pro se, appeals from an order denying reconsideration of the District Court's earlier order dismissing his complaint as frivolous pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We affirm because the District Court was indisputably correct to deem Rivera's claims frivolous on the ground that his allegations are entirely "the product of delusion or fantasy." Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). Furthermore, we warn Rivera that the filing of frivolous appeals, motions, petitions or other documents in the future may result in the imposition of monetary sanctions or the requirement that he obtain permission of the Court before making future filings. See In re Martin-Trigona, 9 F.3d 226, 227, 229 (2d Cir. 1993); Sassower v. Sansverie, 885 F.2d 9, 10 (2d Cir. 1989).

We have considered all of Rivera's remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED, and Rivera is hereby WARNED regarding the possible consequences of future frivolous submissions.


Summaries of

Rivera v. Food and Drug Admin

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sep 22, 2009
346 F. App'x 693 (2d Cir. 2009)

warning a pro se plaintiff with a history of frivolous litigation, that he may have to seek leave of court before filing any further actions

Summary of this case from U.S. ex rel. Wolf v. United States
Case details for

Rivera v. Food and Drug Admin

Case Details

Full title:Vincent F. RIVERA, as next friend for Marie Elaine Net…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

346 F. App'x 693 (2d Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. ex rel. Wolf v. United States

For the reasons set forth above, the writ is summarily dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, the Court warns…