From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01248-LTB (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01248-BNB

06-19-2013

JOSE RIVERA, Applicant, v. C. DANIELS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Applicant, Jose Rivera, is in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons and currently is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Florence, Colorado. Applicant, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing an Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In an order entered on May 14, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland instructed Applicant to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland instructed Applicant to submit a proper 28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion and Affidavit that is used by prisoners seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a § 2241 action and a certified statement showing the current balance in his prison account. Although Applicant submitted a copy of a withdrawal request that he alleges he submitted to the BOP to disburse the $5.00 to the court clerk, the Court did not receive the $5.00 payment.

Magistrate Judge Boland warned Applicant that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed either to submit a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 motion or in the alternative pay the $5.00 filing fee within thirty days. Therefore, the action will be dismissed.

The Court also certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal she must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Application is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure all deficiencies and for failure to prosecute. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 19th day of June, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Rivera v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01248-LTB (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Rivera v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:JOSE RIVERA, Applicant, v. C. DANIELS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01248-LTB (D. Colo. Jun. 19, 2013)