From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2020
Case No.: 20-cv-1831-GPC-RBM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 20-cv-1831-GPC-RBM

11-17-2020

RICKEY V. RIVERA, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION AND ENLARGING TIME TO SATISFY THE FILING FEE REQUIREMENT

On September 15, 2020, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) On September 17, 2010, the Court dismissed this action because Petitioner had failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Petitioner was instructed that to have this action reopened he was required to either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before November 17, 2020. (Id. at 1.) He has now filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.)

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because Petitioner has not provided the Court with sufficient information to determine his financial status. A request to proceed in forma pauperis made by a state prisoner must include a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer showing the amount of money or securities Petitioner has on account in the institution. Rule 3(a)(2), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254; Local Rule 3.2. Petitioner has provided the Court with a blank copy of the required Prison Certificate. (ECF No. 3 at 5.)

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the request to proceed in forma pauperis. This case remains DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement as set forth in the Court's September 17, 2010 Order of dismissal. The Court ENLARGES the time for Petitioner to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a properly supported in forma pauperis application. To have the case reopened, Petitioner must, no later than December 17 , 2020 , provide the Court with: (1) a copy of this Order together with the $5.00 filing fee; or (2) a copy of this Order together with adequate proof that Petitioner cannot pay the $5.00 filing fee. The Clerk of Court will send Petitioner a blank Southern District of California in forma pauperis application which contains the proper prison certificate along with a copy of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 17, 2020

/s/_________

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rivera v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2020
Case No.: 20-cv-1831-GPC-RBM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Rivera v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY V. RIVERA, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 20-cv-1831-GPC-RBM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2020)