From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera-Lind v. Pettiford

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division
Oct 10, 2006
C/A No. 8:05-3333-GRA-BHH (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2006)

Opinion

C/A No. 8:05-3333-GRA-BHH.

October 10, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court for review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(c), D.S.C., and filed September 12, 2006. Petitioner brings this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The magistrate recommends that the respondent's motion for summary judgment be granted and that the petition be dismissed with prejudice.

Petitioner brings this motion pro se. This Court is required to construe pro se pleadings liberally. Such pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys. Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 (1978). This Court is charged with liberally construing a pleading filed by a pro se litigant to allow for the development of a potentially meritorious claim. Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 (1972).

The magistrate makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Matthews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the magistrate, or recommit the matter to him with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th. Cir. 1983). Objections to the Report and Recommendation have not been filed.

After a review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation, this Court finds the report is based upon the proper law. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's motion for summary judgment be GRANTED and that the petition be DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rivera-Lind v. Pettiford

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division
Oct 10, 2006
C/A No. 8:05-3333-GRA-BHH (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Rivera-Lind v. Pettiford

Case Details

Full title:Hector Luis Rivera-Lind, Petitioner, v. M. Pettiford, Warden of…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson Division

Date published: Oct 10, 2006

Citations

C/A No. 8:05-3333-GRA-BHH (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Owens

Robinson v. Warden, 250 Fed. App'x 462, 463 (D.N.J. 2007). In Robinson, the court upheld the BOP's definition…