From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera-Bottzeck v. Ortiz

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 4, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01434-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 4, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01434-DME-BNB.

October 4, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me on Applicant/Petitioners [sic] PRO-SE Motion for Clarification. . . . [Doc. #10, filed 8/15/06] (the "Motion"). The Applicant seeks clarification of an order dated August 8, 2006, from which, the Applicant claims, "it appears . . . that this Court has decided to adjudicate this case as though it is not a Section 2254 case, but rather a regular Civil Case." Motion, p. 2.

The Court is aware that the Applicant is proceeding on an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and is treating the action as such. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Rivera-Bottzeck v. Ortiz

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 4, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01434-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Rivera-Bottzeck v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:OTTO F. RIVERA-BOTTZECK, Applicant, v. JOSEPH ORTIZ, Executive Director…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 4, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01434-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 4, 2006)