From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

River Bank America v. Stabile

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1995
216 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 15, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


Inasmuch as an action to foreclose a mortgage is an equitable proceeding ( Jamaica Sav. Bank v. M.S. Investing Co., 274 N.Y. 215, 219; Blomgren v. Tinton 763 Corp., 18 A.D.2d 979, 980), we agree with the IAS Court that under the circumstances herein the plaintiff mortgagee may be compelled to issue an assignment of the mortgage upon full payment of the mortgage indebtedness pursuant to Real Property Law § 275 ( see, Goldstein v. Soledad Place Corp., 157 Misc.2d 801).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

River Bank America v. Stabile

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1995
216 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

River Bank America v. Stabile

Case Details

Full title:RIVER BANK AMERICA, Appellant, v. ARTHUR STABILE, JR., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 104 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 102

Citing Cases

2301 Jerome Avenue Realty Corp. v. Di Paolo

The plaintiff cross-moves for attorney's fees pursuant to a stipulation of the parties made September 30,…

2301 JEROME AVE. v. Di Paolo

Since an action to foreclose a mortgage is equitable in nature (River Bank Am. v Stabile, 216 AD2d 104 [1st…