From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivas v. Desert Palace, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 14, 2022
2:19-cv-01637-KJD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01637-KJD-DJA

01-14-2022

DANIELA RIVAS, an individual; Plaintiff, v. DESERT PALACE, LLC Defendant.

Gabroy Law Offices Christian Gabroy (#8805) Kaine Messer (#14240) The District at Green Valley Ranch Attorneys for Plaintiff Shannon Pierce, Esq Attorney for Defendant


Gabroy Law Offices

Christian Gabroy (#8805)

Kaine Messer (#14240)

The District at Green Valley Ranch

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Shannon Pierce, Esq

Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL ORDER

(FIFTH REQUEST)

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL ORDER

The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, submit the following Stipulation and Order for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Order (FIFTH Request). Specifically, the parties request the deadline to file their Joint Pretrial Order be extended by thirty days (30) from January 12, 2022 to February 11, 2022.

This is the fifth request to extend the time to file the Pretrial Order. All requests for extension, including the current request, have been and are made in good faith. As for the current request, the parties participated in an extensive mediation before JAMS on November 19, 2021. Unfortunately, the matter was not able to successfully resolve. As the parties participated in such mediation, such efforts were focused on resolution.

Further, during that time period, lead trial counsel for Plaintiff completed a trial in state court, had further personnel transition at his office, and spent time attending to a personal family member whose medical condition and pending matters have occupied such time for personal matters. Such personal matters have occupied counsel's time accordingly.

Further, Plaintiffs counsel has tendered the first draft of the PTO to Defense counsel and the parties request ample time to finalize the PTO as the draft will be subject to modifications by both parties. Defense counsel tendered response to the first draft recently and Plaintiffs counsel is working on finalizing further changes, modifications, and/or revisions. Counsel are working together towards finalization of such PTO.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. No. further extension will be granted.


Summaries of

Rivas v. Desert Palace, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 14, 2022
2:19-cv-01637-KJD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Rivas v. Desert Palace, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DANIELA RIVAS, an individual; Plaintiff, v. DESERT PALACE, LLC Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 14, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-01637-KJD-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2022)