From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivas v. Arreguin

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 25, 2017
No. 73912 (Nev. Sep. 25, 2017)

Opinion

No. 73912

09-25-2017

JAVIER RAMIREZ RIVAS, Appellant, v. MAYRA ARREGUIN, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for an order to show cause to hold respondent in contempt. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. V. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order of contempt. See Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners Ass'n, 116 Nev. 646, 649, 5 P.3d 569, 571 (2000) (recognizing that a contempt order is not appealable). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge

Javier Ramirez Rivas

Mayra Arreguin

Carson City Clerk


Summaries of

Rivas v. Arreguin

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 25, 2017
No. 73912 (Nev. Sep. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Rivas v. Arreguin

Case Details

Full title:JAVIER RAMIREZ RIVAS, Appellant, v. MAYRA ARREGUIN, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 25, 2017

Citations

No. 73912 (Nev. Sep. 25, 2017)