From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritzcovan v. Burger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.).


Ordered that on the appeal of Robert Ritzcovan, the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that on the appeal of Donald Sampson, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Contrary to the plaintiffs' contentions, the defendant's statements were absolutely privileged, as they were made in the context of a quasi-judicial proceeding ( see, Toker v. Pollak, 44 N.Y.2d 211; Harms v. Riordan-Bellizi, 223 A.D.2d 624; Herzfeld Stern v. Beck, 175 A.D.2d 689, 691; Missick v. Big V Supermarkets, 115 A.D.2d 808). The Supreme Court therefore correctly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

O'Brien, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ritzcovan v. Burger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Ritzcovan v. Burger

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT RITZCOVAN, Appellant, v. WARREN BURGER, Respondent. (Action No. 1.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 327

Citing Cases

Matter of Dunn v. Ladenburg Thalmann Co.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the cross…