From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 5, 1969
407 F.2d 403 (4th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 12808.

Argued January 8, 1969.

Decided February 5, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia; Robert W. Hemphill, Judge. 295 F. Supp. 1360.

Thomas Kemmerlin, Jr., Columbia, S.C. (J. Edwin Belser, Columbia, S.C., on brief), for appellant.

Dallas D. Ball, Columbia, S.C. (Luther M. Lee, Columbia, S.C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.


Allied Chemical Corporation, the defendant below, moved for judgment on the pleadings, contending that the District Court had no jurisdiction because the plaintiff was restricted to the exclusive remedy created by the South Carolina Workmen's Compensation Act. The District Court denied the motion, authorizing an appeal from its interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). For the reasons stated by the District Court, its denial of the motion is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 5, 1969
407 F.2d 403 (4th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Ritter v. Allied Chemical Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Frances RITTER, Appellee, v. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 5, 1969

Citations

407 F.2d 403 (4th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Summers v. Western Idaho Potato Processing Co.

The statutes themselves make this evident. I.C. § 72-203; Gifford et al. v. Nottingham, 68 Idaho 330, 334,…

Richard v. Washburn Pub. Sch.

“Here we are fortunate in having an actual decided case that makes the point. In Ritter v. Allied Chemical…