From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritchie v. Kinnane

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 9, 2008
C.A. No. 07-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2008)

Opinion

C.A. No. 07-257 Erie.

June 9, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiffs' civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on September 25, 2007, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on May 7, 2008, recommended that Plaintiffs Cruz and Garcia be dismissed from the instant civil rights action due to their failure to prosecute. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on all Plaintiffs by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review ofthe pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Cruz and Garcia are DISMISSED from this civil rights action due to their failure to prosecute this case. The Clerk of Courts is directed to terminate Cruz and Garcia from the docket..

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated May 7, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Ritchie v. Kinnane

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 9, 2008
C.A. No. 07-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Ritchie v. Kinnane

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON RITCHIE MILTON CRUZ and WILSON GARCIA, Plaintiffs, v. DEPUTY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 9, 2008

Citations

C.A. No. 07-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2008)