From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritchie v. Kinnane

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 2, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-257 Erie.

January 2, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. #1] was filed on September 25, 2007 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. Subsequent to the filing of this first Complaint, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on October 29, 2007 [Doc. #11].

Defendants filed a "Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)" on May 27, 2008 [Doc, #55]. In their motion, they asked that the motion to dismiss be treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Motion to Dismiss, p. 1.

On November 21, 2008, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a report and recommendation, recommending that the motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at USP Canaan, where he is incarcerated, and on Defendants. No objections were filed.

Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part "the district court may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2009, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated November 21, 2008, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)" [Doc. #55], treated by this Court as a motion for summary judgment, is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED.

The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.


Summaries of

Ritchie v. Kinnane

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 2, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Ritchie v. Kinnane

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON RITCHIE, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY WARDEN VINCENT KINNANE, et. al…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 2, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2009)