From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rissinger v. State Farm Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-2439 (M.D. Pa. May. 27, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-2439

05-27-2016

MARK RISSINGER and KRISTEN RISSINGER, Plaintiffs v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant


( ) ORDER & JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of defendant's motion (Doc. 20) for summary judgment, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion (Doc. 20) is GRANTED in its entirety.

2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendant and against plaintiffs plaintiffs' breach of contract claim.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Rissinger v. State Farm Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-2439 (M.D. Pa. May. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Rissinger v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARK RISSINGER and KRISTEN RISSINGER, Plaintiffs v. STATE FARM INSURANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 27, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-2439 (M.D. Pa. May. 27, 2016)