From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Risley v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 22, 2012
472 F. App'x 557 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-70656 Tax Ct. No. 10857-05s

03-22-2012

WAYNE ROBERT RISLEY; NANETTE RISLEY, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court


Pasadena, California

Before: FARRIS, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Because the Risleys elected to bring this case as a small tax case, we lack jurisdiction to review the decision of the Tax Court. See 26 U.S.C. § 7463(b); see also Ballard v. Comm'r, 639 F.2d 486 (9th Cir. 1980) (per curiam). We need not consider the question whether there are circumstances in which we would have jurisdiction over a due process claim because the Risleys' claim here is based on the assertion that the rules governing small tax cases do not allow for summary judgment, which is incorrect. See Tax Ct. R. Prac. & Proc. 121, 170.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Risley v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 22, 2012
472 F. App'x 557 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Risley v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE ROBERT RISLEY; NANETTE RISLEY, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 22, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 557 (9th Cir. 2012)