From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Risdon v. Prewett

District Court of Appeals of California, Third District
Nov 14, 1908
99 P. 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1908)

Opinion

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1908

Denied by Supreme Court Jan. 13, 1909

Appeal from Superior Court, Shasta County; Chas. M. Head, Judge.

Action by Herbert T. Risdon against N.C. Prewett and another; W.I. Terry, intervening. From a judgment for intervener, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appeals. Affirmed. Motion to dismiss appeal denied.

See, also, 97 P. 73.

COUNSEL

W.A. Gett and Braynard F. Kimball, for appellant.

W.D. Tillotson (C.H. Dunn, of counsel), for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This case is in all essential respects like Risdon v. Steyner et al. (No. 469, this day decided) 99 P. 377, and for the reasons therein stated the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial are affirmed.


Summaries of

Risdon v. Prewett

District Court of Appeals of California, Third District
Nov 14, 1908
99 P. 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1908)
Case details for

Risdon v. Prewett

Case Details

Full title:RISDON v. PREWETT et al. (TERRY, Intervener).

Court:District Court of Appeals of California, Third District

Date published: Nov 14, 1908

Citations

99 P. 379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1908)