From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ripley v. Jaussen

New York Common Pleas — Additional General Term
Aug 1, 1894
9 Misc. 474 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)

Opinion

August, 1894.

W.W. Foster, for respondent.

J.F. Higgins, for appellant.


Error merely does not suffice to support an appeal. To authorize a reversal the error must have operated prejudicially to the appellant. No possible prejudice here resulted from the judgment rendered, for it merely accomplished what appellant was concededly willing to have occur at the time of the trial.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: BOOKSTAVER and BISCHOFF, J.

Order affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Ripley v. Jaussen

New York Common Pleas — Additional General Term
Aug 1, 1894
9 Misc. 474 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)
Case details for

Ripley v. Jaussen

Case Details

Full title:ANNA J. RIPLEY, Respondent, v . VIRGINIA JAUSSEN, Appellant

Court:New York Common Pleas — Additional General Term

Date published: Aug 1, 1894

Citations

9 Misc. 474 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)
29 N.Y.S. 1148

Citing Cases

Equitable Gas Light Co. v. French

It is clear that the appellant was in no way injured by the justice's according this benefit to the defendant…