From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. Premier Automation Contractors

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 20, 2020
No. 3:19-cv-02016-AC (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-02016-AC

11-20-2020

JENNIFER RIOS, Plaintiff, v. PREMIER AUTOMATION CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge John Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [13] on May 20, 2020, in which he recommends that the Court deny Defendant's motion to dismiss. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation [13]. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [4] is DENIED. This case is STAYED pending issuance of a final order from the workers' compensation system regarding Defendant's status as a noncomplying employer or until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 20, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rios v. Premier Automation Contractors

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 20, 2020
No. 3:19-cv-02016-AC (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Rios v. Premier Automation Contractors

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER RIOS, Plaintiff, v. PREMIER AUTOMATION CONTRACTORS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 20, 2020

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-02016-AC (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2020)