From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. Midwest Partitions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 7, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01456-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-cv-01456-PAB-MEH

08-07-2015

ADAN RIOS, JAMIE BANUELOS, JOSE ANGEL GUTIERREZ, MILTON RANGEL, LAZARO HERNANDEZ, HUASCAR POLANCO, and WILMER POLANCO, on their own behalf and behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MIDWEST PARTITIONS, INC., D&F PARTITIONS, LLC, YOLKINS RES/COM DRYWALL, INC., ALLEN HALL, CESAR QUINTANA, and MARCOS GUTIERREZ, Defendants.


ORDER

The Court takes up this matter sua sponte under its inherent power to regulate and control its civil docket. See Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 411 (1995) (noting that courts "have inherent power to . . . control the disposition of causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants"). On August 6, 2015, defendant Yolkins Res/Com Drywall, Inc. ("Yolkins") filed a document titled Answer Presenting Defenses Under Rule 12(b) [Docket No. 18]. The answer is signed by an individual named Candice Quintana, who does not identify herself as an attorney representing Yolkins. Docket No. 18 at 3. No other attorney has filed an entry of appearance on Yolkins's behalf in this action.

"As a general matter, a corporation or other business entity can only appear in court through an attorney and not through a non-attorney corporate officer appearing pro se." Harrison v. Wahatoyas, LLC, 253 F.3d 552, 556 (10th Cir. 2001); see also Riviera Drilling & Exploration Co. v. Gunnison Energy Corp., 412 F. App'x 89, 92 (10th Cir. 2011) (unpublished) ("[A] corporation cannot appear pro se."); Tal v. Hogan, 453 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2006) ("It has been our long-standing rule that a corporation must be represented by an attorney to appear in federal court."). In addition, this district's Local Attorney Rule 5(b) advises that a corporation, partnership, or other legal entity may not appear without counsel admitted to the bar of this court, and that absent prompt appearance of counsel, "pleadings and papers may be stricken, and default judgment or other sanctions may be imposed against the entity." D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(b).

Wherefore, it is

ORDERED that defendant Yolkins Res/Com Drywall, Inc.'s Answer Presenting Defenses Under Rule 12(b) [Docket No. 18] is STRICKEN.

DATED August 7, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rios v. Midwest Partitions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 7, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01456-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Rios v. Midwest Partitions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADAN RIOS, JAMIE BANUELOS, JOSE ANGEL GUTIERREZ, MILTON RANGEL, LAZARO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 7, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-cv-01456-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 7, 2015)