From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. Indiana University

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Jul 25, 2005
Cause No. 3:04-CV-276RM (N.D. Ind. Jul. 25, 2005)

Opinion

Cause No. 3:04-CV-276RM.

July 25, 2005


OPINION AND ORDER


The defendants reportedly have served discovery requests on two third parties, Florida State University and Lamar University, asking for production of documents related to the plaintiff's prospective employment at both institutions. Cristina Rios filed a motion asking the court to declare these discovery requests inoperative. Then, after learning the requests were accompanied by subpoenas, Ms. Rios moved to quash. The motion to quash effectively replaces Ms. Rios's earlier motion, so her motion to declare the third-party discovery requests inoperative [docket no. 44] is DENIED AS MOOT. In order that the court may resolve this issue expeditiously, the defendants' response to Ms. Rios's motion to quash shall be due not later than August 1, 2005.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rios v. Indiana University

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Jul 25, 2005
Cause No. 3:04-CV-276RM (N.D. Ind. Jul. 25, 2005)
Case details for

Rios v. Indiana University

Case Details

Full title:CRISTINA RIOS, Plaintiff v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY, d/b/a Indiana University…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Jul 25, 2005

Citations

Cause No. 3:04-CV-276RM (N.D. Ind. Jul. 25, 2005)