From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. Ford Motor Company

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 10, 2006
Civil No. 05-0019-CO (D. Or. Jan. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-0019-CO.

January 10, 2006


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 2, 2005. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Rios v. Ford Motor Company

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 10, 2006
Civil No. 05-0019-CO (D. Or. Jan. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Rios v. Ford Motor Company

Case Details

Full title:JOSE BANUELOS RIOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 10, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-0019-CO (D. Or. Jan. 10, 2006)