From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. Fergusen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 4, 2023
2:23-cv-0269 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0269 KJM KJN P

04-04-2023

SOPHIA RIOS, Petitioner, v. TOMAS FERGUSEN, Respondents.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a county jail inmate, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By an order filed February 23, 2023, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or her application would be dismissed. The thirty day period has expired, and petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit and has not paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Rios v. Fergusen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 4, 2023
2:23-cv-0269 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Rios v. Fergusen

Case Details

Full title:SOPHIA RIOS, Petitioner, v. TOMAS FERGUSEN, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 4, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0269 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2023)