Rios v. Bloom Fin. Grp.

Full title: Jessica Diaz Rios v. Bloom Financial Group

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 1, 2011

Case No. CV 11-06146-GAF (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-06146-GAF (SPx)

12-01-2011

Jessica Diaz Rios v. Bloom Financial Group

GARY ALLEN FEESS

CTVTL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable GARY ALLEN FEESS

+-----------------------------------------------+ ¦Renee Fisher¦None ¦N/A ¦ +------------+-------------------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦Tape No.¦ +-----------------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

None

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None

Proceedings: (In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:

[×] Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.