From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RIO Tinto PLC v. Sarei

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 22, 2013
569 U.S. 945 (2013)

Opinion

No. 11–649.

2013-04-22

RIO TINTO PLC, et al., petitioners, v. Alexis Holyweek SAREI, et al.


Case below, 671 F.3d 736.

Motion of Government of Australia, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Professors of International Law, Foreign Relations Law and Federal Jurisdiction for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of National Foreign Trade Council, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.


Summaries of

RIO Tinto PLC v. Sarei

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 22, 2013
569 U.S. 945 (2013)
Case details for

RIO Tinto PLC v. Sarei

Case Details

Full title:RIO TINTO PLC, et al., petitioners, v. Alexis Holyweek SAREI, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Apr 22, 2013

Citations

569 U.S. 945 (2013)
133 S. Ct. 1995
185 L. Ed. 2d 863
81 U.S.L.W. 3595

Citing Cases

Mohammadi v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Related to this issue, five days after the Supreme Court decided Kiobel, the Court vacated a decision in a…

Kashef v. BNP Paribas S.A.

This conclusion is consistent with those of other courts that have directly considered the question. See,…