From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringling Bros. v. Acme Circus Operating, Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1961
12 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

February 2, 1961


Resettled order, entered on December 15, 1960, as denies defendants' motion to vacate or modify plaintiff's notices of examination of the defendants before trial, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Appeal from order, entered on December 13, 1960, denying defendants' motion to vacate or modify plaintiff's notices of examination of defendants before trial, unanimously dismissed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Ringling Bros. v. Acme Circus Operating, Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1961
12 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Ringling Bros. v. Acme Circus Operating, Co.

Case Details

Full title:RINGLING BROS.-BARNUM BAILEY COMBINED SHOWS, INC., Respondent, v. ACME…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1961

Citations

12 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)