From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringgold v. Keller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 11 - 974 (W.D. Pa. May. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11 - 974

05-16-2012

TREVOR RINGGOLD, Plaintiff, v. CO. MATTHEW KELLER, SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN COLEMAN, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES 1-9, Defendants.


District Judge Arthur J, Schwab

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff, Trevor Ringgold ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner who is currently incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff, through counsel, commenced this action on July 27, 2011, against the following individuals employed at the State Correctional Institution at Fayette; Correctional Officer Matthew Keller, Superintendent Brian Coleman, and John or Jane Does 1-9.

On October 24, 2011, Defendant Superintendent Brian Coleman filed a Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 6.) Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan entered a Report and Recommendation on April 28, 2012, recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be denied without prejudice as to Defendant Coleman's contention that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and that the motion be denied as to his contention that Plaintiff has failed to establish the requisite personal involvement necessary to establish a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 19.) The parties were given until May 7, 2012 to file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. No Objections were filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 16 day of May, 2012,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Brian Coleman (ECF No. 6) is denied without prejudice as to Defendant Coleman's contention that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and is denied as to his contention that Plaintiff has failed to establish the requisite personal involvement necessary to establish a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) dated April 18,2012, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

By the Court;

___________

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge
cc: All counsel of record.


Summaries of

Ringgold v. Keller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 11 - 974 (W.D. Pa. May. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Ringgold v. Keller

Case Details

Full title:TREVOR RINGGOLD, Plaintiff, v. CO. MATTHEW KELLER, SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11 - 974 (W.D. Pa. May. 16, 2012)