From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringcentral, Inc. v. Quimby

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Apr 8, 2010
No. C 09-2693 RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 09-2693 RS.

April 8, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT


Plaintiff RingCentral, Inc. moves for default judgment, including entry of a permanent injunction against defendants Bill Quimby and TollFreeNumbers.com, Inc. On February 5, 2010, Judge Spero heard the motion and requested that plaintiff submit certain additional briefing and evidence. On February 26, 2010, Judge Spero issued a Report and Recommendation that the motion for default judgment be granted in part, and denied in part. Docket No. 35. Because defendants have not consented to magistrate jurisdiction, the case was reassigned, and then transferred to the undersigned on March 18, 2010.

No objections per se have been filed. Plaintiff, however, has filed a request that the injunctive language recommended by Judge Spero be expanded to require defendants to turn over to plaintiff the two internet domain names at issue. The Court has reviewed Judge Spero's extensive and thorough report and recommendation, adopts it here in full, and adds the provision that defendants will be expressly required to turn over the domain names to plaintiff. Plaintiff requests that the injunction further provide that if defendants fail to transfer the domain names, then the present registrar of the names will be ordered to effect the transfer. Plaintiff has not offered authority, however, that it would be appropriate for the Court to enter an order purporting to require action to be taken by an entity that has not been party to this action or these proceedings. Accordingly, the injunction will include language authorizing the registrar to transfer the domain names to plaintiff upon plaintiff's request, but it will not enjoin the registrar to do so upon pain of contempt. A separate judgment will be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 04/08/2010


Summaries of

Ringcentral, Inc. v. Quimby

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Apr 8, 2010
No. C 09-2693 RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Ringcentral, Inc. v. Quimby

Case Details

Full title:RINGCENTRAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. BILL QUIMBY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Apr 8, 2010

Citations

No. C 09-2693 RS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

KEMA, INC. v. KOPERWHATS

"The ultimate test for unfair competition is exactly the same as for federal trademark infringement, that…