From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ring v. Howell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
184 N.Y. 553 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1906

Decided February 27, 1906

Robert H. Wilson for appellant.

James C. Cropsey and Frank Mann for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and CHASE, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J. Not sitting: WILLARD BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Ring v. Howell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
184 N.Y. 553 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Ring v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH RING, Respondent, v . EUGENE B. HOWELL, as Receiver of the LONG…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1906

Citations

184 N.Y. 553 (N.Y. 1906)

Citing Cases

Krstovic v. Van Buren

(2 C.J. 440, § 36; Ring v. Long Island Real Estate Exchange, 93 App. Div. 442; affd., sub nom. Ring v.…

Kozecke v. Humble Oil Refining Company

Plaintiff failed to call her husband as a witness in her direct case or in rebuttal. Although an agency…