From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ring v. Erickson

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jan 7, 1993
983 F.2d 821 (8th Cir. 1993)

Summary

finding admission of "available" child declarant's videotaped statements at trial violated defendant's confrontation rights

Summary of this case from Schaal v. Gammon

Opinion

No. 91-2488.

January 7, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota; David S. Doty, Judge.


Because the filing of an amended panel opinion moots the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petition and suggestion are denied on this ground. The court vacates its earlier order granting en banc rehearing on the suggestion.


Summaries of

Ring v. Erickson

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jan 7, 1993
983 F.2d 821 (8th Cir. 1993)

finding admission of "available" child declarant's videotaped statements at trial violated defendant's confrontation rights

Summary of this case from Schaal v. Gammon
Case details for

Ring v. Erickson

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY LEE RING, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT A. ERICKSON, APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 7, 1993

Citations

983 F.2d 821 (8th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

United States v. NB

In sum, when the child whose hearsay testimony is admitted also testifies himself or herself, the only…

U.S. v. Sumner

There is no clear evidence in the record that D.D. knew that she had been brought to Dr. Zitzow for medical…