From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 18, 2017
224 So. 3d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2D16–3769

08-18-2017

RING POWER CORPORATION, Diesel Construction Company, and Mark David Quandt, Appellants, v. Gerardo CONDADO–PEREZ and Nancy Rodriguez–Ventura, Appellees.

Carrie Ann Wozniak of Akerman LLP, Orlando, and Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, for Appellants. Barbara Green, Coral Gables, and Betsey T. Herd of Morgenstern & Herd, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.


Carrie Ann Wozniak of Akerman LLP, Orlando, and Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Barbara Green, Coral Gables, and Betsey T. Herd of Morgenstern & Herd, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the reversal of the underlying judgment on which the attorney's fee order in this appeal is based, Ring Power Corp. v. Condado–Perez, 219 So.3d 1028, 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), we reverse the order on attorney's fees. See ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) ; Siegel v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, 100 So.3d 783, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ; S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 40 So.3d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Reversed.

KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 18, 2017
224 So. 3d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez

Case Details

Full title:RING POWER CORPORATION, Diesel Construction Company, and Mark David…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 18, 2017

Citations

224 So. 3d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)