From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rincon v. Lumpkin

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 17, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00078 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-cv-00078

11-17-2022

MACARIO RINCON, “Petitioner”, v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, “Respondent”.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Rolando Olvera United States District Judge

Before the Court are these pleadings: Plaintiffs “Original Petition for Writ of Habeas” (“Original Petition”) (Dkt No. 1), Plaintiffs “Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas” (“Amended Petition”) (Dkt. No. 5) and Magistrate Judge's “Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 9). The R&R recommends this Court (1) dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Petition (Dkt. No. 5) without prejudice (2) direct the Clerk of Court to close this case and (3) decline to issue a certificate of appealability.

No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.

Plaintiffs Amended Petition (Dkt. No. 5) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Rincon v. Lumpkin

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 17, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00078 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Rincon v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:MACARIO RINCON, “Petitioner”, v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, Director, Texas Department…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-cv-00078 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022)