From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rimer v. Baker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2022
3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2022)

Opinion

3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC

01-04-2022

STANLEY RIMER, Petitioner, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondents have filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time (first request). (ECF No. 75.) The Court finds the motion is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore good cause exists to grant the motion.

It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 75) is granted. Respondents will have up to and including January 18, 2022, to file a response to the motion for an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 74).


Summaries of

Rimer v. Baker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2022
3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Rimer v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY RIMER, Petitioner, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 4, 2022

Citations

3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2022)