From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Feb 25, 2013
1:12-CV-00047-GZS (D.N.H. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-CV-00047-GZS 1:07-CR-00189-GZS

02-25-2013

DANIEL RILEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 28, 2013, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 37). Petitioner filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 39) on February 14, 2013.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion (ECF No. 1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE, and his Petition is DISMISSED.
3. It is hereby ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue in the event Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Riley v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Feb 25, 2013
1:12-CV-00047-GZS (D.N.H. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Riley v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RILEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

1:12-CV-00047-GZS (D.N.H. Feb. 25, 2013)

Citing Cases

Riley v. United States

Petitioner filed his first section 2255 motion in 2012; the Court denied relief on the merits. (Riley v.…

Riley v. Lariva

Riley does not explain how the principle announced in Richardson applies to his trial, to the charges he…