From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 30, 2018
538 S.W.3d 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 79904

01-30-2018

Irvin G. RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, and Karen King Mitchell and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:Irvin Gene Riley appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel (Counsel) was ineffective for (1) presenting an alibi defense; (2) describing exculpatory evidence during his opening statement that he later failed to present; and (3) failing to inform Riley of an amended, more favorable, written plea offer. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 30, 2018
538 S.W.3d 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Riley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Irvin G. RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 30, 2018

Citations

538 S.W.3d 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)