From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 6, 2021
314 So. 3d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2239

04-06-2021

David RILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Gene Mitchell, Pensacola, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Gene Mitchell, Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of making a determination of whether "no conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process." See Art. I, § 14, Fla. Const.; Bannister v. Lamberti, 32 So. 3d 745, 747–48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

B.L. Thomas, Bilbrey, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Riley v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 6, 2021
314 So. 3d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Riley v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 6, 2021

Citations

314 So. 3d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)