Summary
affirming revocation but remanding for correction of revocation order which incorrectly stated that appellant admitted to violation when he was actually found in violation after an evidentiary hearing
Summary of this case from Edwards v. StateOpinion
Case No. 2D01-5621.
Opinion filed March 5, 2003.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; R. Wallace Pack, Judge.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Orentha Desean Riley, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
We affirm the revocation of Orentha Riley's probation but remand for correction of the order of revocation. The order of revocation states that Riley admitted to violating his probation. In fact, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing and revoked Riley's probation over his objections. Therefore, on remand, the trial court must enter a corrected written order reflecting that the trial court revoked Riley's probation.
Affirmed, but remanded for correction of the order of revocation.
WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.