From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2008
50 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3289.

April 8, 2008.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered November 16, 2006, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York (Arnold E. DiJoseph of counsel) for appellant.

Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale (Harris J. Zakarin of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Plaintiff tripped over the top edge of a cellar door that was slightly elevated above the sidewalk, and his own deposition testimony established that the accident occurred in daylight in an area that he traveled on a daily basis. Defendants' motion established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the ground that the alleged defect was trivial, did not constitute a trap or nuisance, and was not actionable as a matter of law ( see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976; Martin v Lafayette Morrison Hous. Corp., 31 AD3d 300). Plaintiff failed to raise a material issue of fact in opposition.


Summaries of

Riley v. New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 8, 2008
50 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Riley v. New York

Case Details

Full title:RONALD RILEY, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and NOR-COURT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3090
854 N.Y.S.2d 400

Citing Cases

Taveras v. City of New York

Following respondent's prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, plaintiff failed to raise a…

Savas v. 557 8th Ave. Corp.

In support of their motions, Defendants produced evidence that the expansion joint was less than one inch…