From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. Mechanics Bank

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Oct 26, 1979
395 N.E.2d 889 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)

Opinion

October 26, 1979.

Roger J. Brunelle for the plaintiffs.

Darragh K. Kasakoff for the defendant.


The plaintiffs are appealing from that part of the Superior Court judge's order which partially denied their motion for a preliminary injunction. See G.L.c. 231, § 118 (second paragraph), as appearing in St. 1977, c. 405. The judge granted the plaintiffs' request to enjoin the defendant from selling or transferring certain assets of the Chapin Riley Trust B, but refused to enjoin the defendant from selling certain other shares of the plaintiffs' stock which were in the defendant's possession.

On examination of the record, and consideration of the arguments, we are unable to discern any abuse of discretion in the Superior Court judge's ruling. Jones v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authy., 7 Mass. App. Ct. 914 (1979). See Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc., 367 Mass. 464, 472-473 (1975). But see Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commn. v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 844 (D.C. Cir. 1977).

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Riley v. Mechanics Bank

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Oct 26, 1979
395 N.E.2d 889 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)
Case details for

Riley v. Mechanics Bank

Case Details

Full title:CHAPIN RILEY another vs. MECHANICS BANK

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Oct 26, 1979

Citations

395 N.E.2d 889 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979)
8 Mass. App. Ct. 918

Citing Cases

Charger Investments, Inc. v. City of Revere

We conclude that in light of the regulation and the uncontradicted facts asserted in the plaintiffs'…