Opinion
Argued January 15, 1891
Decided February 3, 1891
Donohue, Newcombe Cardozo for appellants.
Thomas E. Pearsall for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Riley v. Gitterman
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1891
125 N.Y. 727 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Riley v. Gitterman
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 3, 1891
125 N.Y. 727 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Riley v. Gitterman
Case Details
Full title:JULIA A. RILEY, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . HENRY GITTERMAN…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 3, 1891
Citations
125 N.Y. 727 (N.Y. 1891)
35 N.Y. St. Rptr. 995
Citing Cases
Robinson v. Thomas. No. 1
On these facts the order could have been made without prejudice to the proceedings already had in the action,…
Reed v. FarrandThe provisions of section 1298 relate to the disposition of an appeal where a a party thereto dies before it…