Riley v. California

Full title: Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 2001

4 F. App'x 480 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

4 Fed.Appx. 480 (9th Cir. 2001) Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, People of California, Plaintiff-Cross-defendant-Appellee. No. 99-55532. D.C. No. CV-99-00118-JTM/JAH. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 22, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001. ¹

1 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ²

2 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Dasha Riley appeals pro se the district court's order remanding her action to state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4) after Riley sought to remove a pending criminal case from the Municipal Court of California involving a charge of driving a vehicle while intoxicated. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 3, 1999.

AFFIRMED.