From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 22, 2001
4 F. App'x 480 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


4 Fed.Appx. 480 (9th Cir. 2001) Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, People of California, Plaintiff-Cross-defendant-Appellee. No. 99-55532. D.C. No. CV-99-00118-JTM/JAH. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 22, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Dasha Riley appeals pro se the district court's order remanding her action to state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4) after Riley sought to remove a pending criminal case from the Municipal Court of California involving a charge of driving a vehicle while intoxicated. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 3, 1999.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Riley v. California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 22, 2001
4 F. App'x 480 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Riley v. California

Case Details

Full title:Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 22, 2001

Citations

4 F. App'x 480 (9th Cir. 2001)