The majority overruled that issue, finding that Appellant forfeited those claims by not appealing the original order deferring an adjudication of guilt. See Riles v. State, 417 S.W.3d 606, 607, 2013 WL 5568716, at *1, 2013 Tex.App. LEXIS 12446, at *2 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Oct. 7, 2013, no pet. h.). Now Appellant wants to raise new issues pertaining to the assessment of a $10 subpoena fee and $90 in sheriff's fees.
The $2050 amount is reduced by only $1150 because $900 of the fees was assessed when the adjudication of appellant's guilt was originally deferred and he was placed on community supervision. Because the error was not appealed at that time, we may not consider it now. Wiley v. State, No. PD-1728-12, 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1464, at *21-22 (Tex. Crim. App. September 25, 2013); Riles v. State, No. 07-12-00386-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 12446, at *7-9 (Tex. App.—Amarillo October 7, 2013, no pet. h.). --------