Opinion
Argued December 6, 1889
Decided December 20, 1889
Hugo Hirsh for appellant.
Albert G. McDonald for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rikel v. Ferguson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1889
22 N.E. 1134 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Rikel v. Ferguson
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 20, 1889
22 N.E. 1134 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Rikel v. Ferguson
Case Details
Full title:ROBERT N. RIKEL an Infant, Appellant, v . ROBERT B. FERGUSON, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 20, 1889
Citations
22 N.E. 1134 (N.Y. 1889)
22 N.E. 1134
27 N.Y. St. Rptr. 981
Citing Cases
Schliermann v. Hammond Co.
" To substantially the same effect see Rikel v. Ferguson, 5 N.Y. Supp. 774; Oszkoscil v. Eagle Pencil Co., 6…
Lorenz v. Erie Railroad Co.The master had fully discharged the duty it owed on the theory on which this action was brought. ( Dobbins v.…