From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigsby v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
NO. CV 11-02766 SJO (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CV 11-02766 SJO (PJWx)

08-02-2011

Armonia Rigsby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. County of Los Angeles, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deborah De La Parra, and Kary Ikemoto's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on the ground that no disputed issues of material fact exist for trial on Plaintiffs Rigsby and J.R.'s federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of right of privacy for juvenile records. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants County of Los Angeles, Deborah De La Parra, and Kary Ikemoto dismissing Plaintiffs Rigsby and J.R.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim.

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rigsby v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
NO. CV 11-02766 SJO (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Rigsby v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:Armonia Rigsby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. County of Los Angeles, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

NO. CV 11-02766 SJO (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Citing Cases

Nunes v. Arata, Swingle, Van Egmond & Goodwin

The A.C. court followed the reasoning of two unpublished district court cases that reached the same…

A.C. v. Cortez

Most of the district courts to consider the issue have concluded that Gonzalez did not recognize a…